Further Evidence of Two Different Hydrogels with Testing

In the last post I suggested we have one common hydrogel shown on PRF (platelet rich fibrin) and another hydrogel with the 4 hr test.

In posts in the past I showed that hemolysis (breakage of red cells) stops the expression of the hydrogel in the tube. As I thought about this it seemed a good test to perform on the two different hydrogels being detected.

I collected blood by venipuncture into two 5 ml glass, plain red top vacutainer tubes. One tube would be a control and was centrifuged nearly immediately post collection of blood and spun at 1,000 rpm for 8 min. This would be the PRF control tube. After the spin the serum was noted to be straw colored and initially liquid but after 5 to 10 min became gel like as per the following picture indicates. The tube is held horizontally and gel does not flow.

The contents were fully examined by releasing onto a plate. The predominantly fibrin hydrogel measured 30x15x5 mm.

The gel was rinsed, squeezed, and given 5 min. This showed the calamari effect and was rubbery.

One ml of distilled water was added to the 2nd tube to facilitate hemolysis and the tube was centrifuged for 8 min at 1,000 rpm. After the spin an area of hemolysis was noted in the serum as it was pink stained. The serum subsequently formed a gel within a few minutes as the following picture indicates.

Full exam was performed by emptying the contents onto a plate and gel was measured.

The gel was rinsed, squeezed, and given five minutes to demonstrate the white, rubbery calamari effect.

Two plain 8 ml plastic red top tubes were used in the 4 hr test. The control tube was filled about halfway with blood and allowed to sit for 4 hours. It showed a white area above the red blood clot in the tube as the following picture shows.

Full exam was done after 4.5 hrs after blood collection by dumping the tube contents on a plate. This is shown in next picture and a white, rubbery area is present. I would refer to this as the 4 hour gel.

The rubbery thick gel was rinsed and minimal shrinkage was noted after 5 min. See the following pic.

The other 8 ml plastic red top tube was similarly filled about halfway with blood but 1 ml of distilled water was added to facilitate hemolysis and the tube was allowed to sit for 4 hours. The tube as expected had a blood clot form and over the 4 hours the clot retracted and a red tinted serum appeared as the following picture indicates.

No white area appeared in the tube. The contents were emptied onto a plate and a lighter red area on the upper clot was noted and teased away. The following two pictures shows this.

The fragment was not rubber like and was friable (easily broken up). It did not survive the rinse and essentially dissolved with rinsing ( more like a normal currant jelly clot).

Summary and Discussion. I feel the above findings indicate the presence of at least two gels being detected by the two tests. The PRF method detects a fibrin rich hydrogel that is unaffected by hemolysis. I would expect this since the fibrin hydrogel is what every living person should show with PRF method. Fibrin is the netting that surrounds a normal blood clot at an injury site and will contract to bring a wound edge closer together. It is by definition a hydrogel formed from soluble fibrinogen (dissolved) when activated by the normal blood clotting cascade transforms into a 3D network solid (gel). This process is not stopped by hemolysis by the fact there are several hemolytic diseases and are not characterized by abnormal bleeding. This does exclude an end of life situation called disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in which nearly all blood coagulation factors are used up and also has hemolysis. Remember per Dr Douglas Kell the main issue with fibrin is that it is fibrinaloid when acted upon by spike and will not break down readily causing many “post covid" symptoms.

The 4 hour test control tube showed the presence of a rubbery solid that came out of solution and was mostly separate from the current jelly clot formed from fibrin, platelets, and red blood cells. This was severely suppressed when hemolysis was present. I would say my last post also suggested it has a temperature sensitive nature and is also suppressed at body temperature (I want to repeat that test). What could this other solid (I guess a hydrogel) be? One possibility is it is made of the denatured proteins, spike, as well as some smaller amounts of fibrin that result from the autoimmune vessel wall destruction from having spike produced there. Here again is a slide from the late German pathologist Dr Arne Burkhardt that analyzed the blood of an affected individual and found vessel wall components.

So as a summary, PRF testing will show a hydrogel in all individuals. So no need to do it. The 30 min waiting of blood to clot in a glass or pro coagulant red top tube should be avoided since the fibrin clot can trap in its net like fibers red cells as well as most of the other hydrogel(s). I suspect waiting less than 30 min prior to centrifuge may not trap as much of other gels but no established protocol exists, so I would not use the centrifuge and would do the 4 hour test using 8 to 10 ml plastic vacutainer tubes. This would simulate Dr Ana's 30 ml whole blood syringe test. She has shown EDTA, vitC, and methylene blue helps.

Again the FLCCC has treatment protocols published and I like Dr Peter Mccullough and Dr Pierre Kory for good information on treatments.

O Lord, You have searched me and known me. You know my sitting down and my rising up; You understand my thought afar off. Psm 139: 1-2